One Legal System for One Human community:

[One Law One Nation]:

One community of human beings irrespective of caste, tribe, religion, language and country living in this earth should have one legal system if we consider ourselves as one cultured, developed and advanced in the 21^st Century in the field of mutual understanding in creating a world of peace and tranquility. India was an underdeveloped land of superstition and it had framed its constitution based on the Parliamentary system of British administration but with much more modification after independence of India in 1947, keeping judiciary as an independent body. But even in this under developed part of the world, there were few human beings whose thought of philosophy is in no way inferior to any developed part of the world. The name of S. Radhakrishanan, the IST vice President and the 2^nd President of India is an exception to thought of.

Dr. S. Radhakrishanan:

He was Sarvepalli Radhakrishanan, an Indian philosopher and he was who introduced the thinkers of Western idealist philosophers into Indian thought. He was a teacher of every aspect of life. He was not only a master in philosophy but also a master in classic of Hindu philosophy, namely the Upanishads, Bhagvad Gita, Brahmasutra, and commentaries of Sankara, Ramunuja and Madhava. He acquainted himself with Buddhist and Jain philosophy and philosophers of Western thinkers such as Plato, Plotinus, Kant, Bradley and Bergson. He was once called to Oxford University to deliver lecture on Hindu philosophy. He was successful to place Indian Philosophy on world map. Once he said “ Our colleges of law do not hold a place of high esteem either at home or abroad, nor has law become an area of profound scholarship and enlightened research”

Vision of PM of India:

The Prime Minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, the architect of Indian progress of economy expressed his views in the National Conference for Second Generation Reforms in Legal education to provide a world class legal education through a ‘dramatic reform’ of the present system to ensure citizens get speedy and affordable excess to justice. Exceeding India he thought of other countries of South East Asia as well. His vision was to establish a new South Asian University by the Indian government with other South Asian countries that would ultimately expand to include an outstanding law faculty with an eminent global faculty. Of course he added that “our new five-year law schools across India have shown that we are second to none when we make up our mind but we have to spread this excellence for ensuring inclusive legal education”.

Justice of Law demands common acts of legality:

In view of reform of legal system everywhere with the understanding of the maturity of the human value PM said “ If we are to have a society …where the common man and common woman gets speedy and affordable excess to justice, if we are to have in our country the turbulence in effect of the rule of law, if we are to have an economic environment where contracts are easily enforceable, then we must ensure that our law teachers, practicing advocates, corporate legal luminaries, legal advisers, judicial officers and legal facilitators are indeed men and women of high intellectual caliber”. “And this is possible only if there is dramatic reform and improvement in the scope and quality of the legal education system”. This is true for every country and everywhere. There would not be any bar to merge the high quality of legality in sorting the problems relating to local or international level. If the Global distance reduces to zero by speedy flight making the large Earth to a small cricket ball, why does it not possible to think of the merging of law of different countries and conversion of continent to one nation of human beings in the sphere of administration and justice.

Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons:

No doubt, this is a vital issue for the survival of human life irrespective of country, religion or community. It does not require a reminder of imagination as it was almost 65 years ago the world stood horrified at the events of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. But till today the world opinion is not unanimous to halt the spread of nuclear weapons.

The Judiciary of India:

The Judiciary of India is not a part of the Executive and Legislative wings of the Government of India.  It is an independent body. The judicial system of India is classified into various levels. The Supreme Court is at the top of Judiciary, which is followed by High Courts at the state level and District Courts at the district level. The structure of the judiciary system in India is a follow up system of British administration that was prevalent in the country during pre-independence era.

Inter national Court of Justice:

The International Court of Justice or in French: Court international de justice; commonly referred to as the World Court or ICJ:

The Court is the primary judicial organ of the United Nations. It was established in 1945 after world war-II and since then the Court has been functioning from its center at Peace Palace in the The Hague, Netherlands. Its object is to settle legal disputes submitted by the States and its function is to give advisory opinions on legal questions submitted to it by duly authorized international organs, agencies, and the UN General Assembly. The decision of the International court is not accepted by many countries in most of the times. Many times the International Court has been criticized with respect to its rulings, its procedure, and its authority. The Court is not empowered with full authority of separation of powers. Any permanent members of the Security Council can disobey the earlier consented decision, the members being able to veto enforcement at the neck of final decision of international importance. The act of voting against the united decision by any member is due to the desire of his country men or for the wish of his friendly countries or communities. The ultimate decision depends upon the citizens of the country. If the ‘Reform of Law’ local or abroad are nurtured every where in every country, the self interest, the local interest, the religious interest, the community interest, the interest for the sake country will slowly tend to transform to the value of humanity when voting against the United decision of Security Council will never arise.

The Myth of the Independence of the Judiciary in Europe:

The legal system is flouted by few politicians for self interest. Netanyahu said “We will not accept a situation in which any former Israeli Minister will be summoned to the defendants’ chair” in public. According to him any Israeli politician is beyond the law, beyond questioning for any war crimes against humanity. Such a statement would create an atmosphere that would not be favorable for a real end to the conflict. Law of conscious is a part of humanity. It is a test of judiciary for America, Britain and other countries of Europe to allow the Israelis to build settlements in the West Bank and Jerusalem killing thousands of Palestinian citizens.